Editorial: To Dialogue or Not to Dialogue: That is the
Question. By Roy Oksnevad
Published under “Featured Article” at www.globalmissiology.org,
April 2008
Muslims have drafted an
open letter entitled, “A COMMON WORD BETWEEN US” (http://www.acommonword.com/), expressing a desire to dialogue with Christians.
Christians have responded with their
own letter (http://www.yale.edu/faith/abou-commonword.htm).
Does this mean Muslims have come to
a new understanding in wanting relations with Christians? Should Christians consider this open letter as an open door to dialogue,
or should we remain overly cautious? (see http://www.barnabasfund.org/news/archives/text.php?ID_news_items=342)
Personal Experience with Dialogue
I was at an interfaith dialogue in New York City
with high officials from the Muslim world. Their idea of “interfaith dialogue” was to tell Christians that
if we believe as the Qur'an states we should believe,
there is no difference between us. I
was offended by these pre-prepared statements; they had no feel or understanding of Christian doctrine or what
Christians believe. This was not dialogue; it was monologue, with an occasional real interchange.
Is this Open Letter a sincere desire from Muslims
to have dialogue which has no hidden agenda? Even the title—“A COMMON WORD BETWEEN US" (Surah 3:64 read 61-72)—comes from
a very offensive verse in the Qur'an which is a call for Christians to become Muslim.
Muslims are, however, recognizing that
there is a war for the soul and reputation of Islam. They perceive the threat
coming from two fronts— from within Islam, expressed through “puritan” Islam which
perpetrates the ugly expressions of Islam and from the media and Evangelical Christians who highlight evil, hate
and destruction perpetrated in the name
of Islam. Moderate Muslims need to dialogue with the world for their very
survival.
This letter is unprecedented in that it seems to
be a call to dialogue with Christians about two subjects: (1) the love of God and (2) the love of neighbor. Who
else but Evangelical Christians are the ones to speak on these topics? I say, let’s dialogue. However,
we should not be naive in coming to the table to talk. We should define the love of God and the love of
neighbor in a biblical sense, not an Islamic sense. The love of neighbor should
include not calling Christians and Jews names and not misrepresenting Christian
doctrine. Even the practice of cursing Jews and Christians after Juma (Friday
of the love of God and
neighbor are great themes to dialogue on. However, dialogue without clear steps
to change agreed-upon grievances is
futile and discourages Christian interaction with Muslims.
Dialogue Defined
Dialogue by definition recognizes
the legitimacy of the other person. If Muslims want dialogue, they must come
face-to-face with what Christians really believe, not what the Qur'an says Christians believe. If they cannot,
they are not ready for dialogue. Christians should realize that if Muslim
leaders accept our
definitions of faith, then they
must face their own people who refuse to accept the legitimacy of the other. We
should help to call them upward to God's standard of love.
Will true dialogue happen? Don’t expect it.
However, Evangelical Christians must be present for Muslims to hear a clear gospel message; liberal Christians
will not give them one. If Muslims want to talk, we should talk in a manner filled with compassion, love
and an uncompromising belief in the Christian faith. Our love to openly dialogue with them must be
modeled for them. This will only happen when we talk. So let's talk.
Views from a Former Muslim
I interviewed a Muslim Background Believer, who
initiated dialogues between Muslims and Christians for ten years while
he himself was still a Muslim. After asking him his opinion on dialogues with Muslims, he said that dialogue is difficult
because many people, particularly Muslims, are not sincere and honest in wanting to dialogue. Muslims need to be
honest with themselves about Islam and the Qur’an before they will be honest with us. This MBB
explained that Muslims prefer not to dialogue on a theological level, but on a social level, or in
the area that some call “religious humanism.”1 He speculated three possible motivations for Muslims wanting
dialogue with Christians:
1. Moderate Muslims want
to present a good face of Islam to the West.
2. Muslims want to
express their concern of the threat of Christian missionaries.
3. Moderate Muslims want
to give hope to disillusioned Muslims that there is good in Islam.
When asked what role dialogue played in his coming
to Christ, the MBB replied that only the interaction with Evangelical Christians made an impact on his
life; dialogues with liberal Christians did not.
Conclusion
Muslims have requested dialogue
with Christians. The topics for discussion suggested by Muslims are the love
of God and the love of neighbor. Is this a great place to start discussion with
Muslims? Yes indeed! Do Muslims understand the
biblical definition of these two topics? No. Is it possible that Muslims have a
hidden agenda? Probable. Should
Christians refuse to talk with Muslims under these two topics? If we don’t,
who will? Moderate Muslims want to talk. Let’s talk.
1 In Khaled Abou el Fadl’s book, The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the
Extremists, he lays his thesis for “Moderate” Islam which he describes as
anchoring Islam in a humanistic understanding of their religion to gain the moral
and ethical direction Allah has given.